New way of thinking in paternity law?

I've written on several occasions about paternity law, and the presumption that a child born during a marriage, is the legal child of the husband (regardless of biological ties).  The law may be slowly evolving on that point.  In Kentucky, the state supreme court recently held that a biological father could assert paternity rights on his child, whose mother is married to another man.   The opinion notes that in an age with DNA testing to a scientific certainty, it makes no sense to rely on legal presumptions instead.  I suspect someday Maryland will follow suit as well.   

Read about it on the Wall Street Journal Law Blog here.

Read Jonathan Turley's take here.